The Understanding Project
  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books

It Depends On The Frame

6/4/2011

 
Most people are moderates and don’t feel we live in a particularly divided country. The media, of course, frames everything in terms of left and right and has to find ways to classify people as one or the other. Whether someone is a conservative or liberal then, depends on how the issues are framed.

Suppose I told you that I knew a guy who supports civil unions. Is this guy a liberal? Suppose I told you this guy is also against extending marriage to homosexuals. The media will often group this guy in with those that support “gay marriage” and pit him against those that do not, but there are many among the anti-gay-marriage group that might also be persuaded to accept civil unions under the right conditions, and an us-versus-them debate with no middle ground is not the right condition.

Suppose I told you that this same guy despises ritual and thinks little of organized religions, seeing them as little more than a means to hold power over the masses. He’s certainly not a fundamentalist. At the same time, he takes a literal interpretation of Genesis.

Suppose I told you this same guy believes in preserving the natural world and even believes the government has a role to play in protecting the environment. Is he an environmentalist? Suppose I told you this same guy believes global warming is a hoax.

Suppose I told you this guy calls himself a capitalist, believes we have far too many regulations, far too many taxes, and is deeply suspicious of government meddling in the free market. Suppose I told you he is also deeply suspicious of corporations and recognizes we can never have a truly free market with them around.

Suppose I told you this guy believes the death penalty is justifiable in extreme cases, but that just because something is justifiable doesn’t mean it’s a good idea, and that the death penalty is bad policy. When the pollsters call his house asking where he falls on the issue, what does he say? Can we trust polls at all when they only record yes/no answers?

This is a real person.

In his 2007 book, The Political Brain, Doctor Drew Westen claims that most people have complex ambivalence about most issues, and that the Republicans offer only black-and-white so they can offer a principled stance while the Democrats trip over their own nuances. For example, he claims that he himself recognizes that abortion is the taking of a life and not something to be taken casually, but that he still believes in the mother’s right to choose. He points out that many Democrats are against flag-burning and willing to make it illegal, but not to pass a constitutional amendment against it. By framing the debate as an all-or-nothing deal, Republicans make Democrats look unprincipled. Doctor Westen claims the “left” actually represents most people, including the middle, while the “right” is only a radical fringe.

Interestingly, Republicans make much the same claims – except in reverse. While President Bush and the Republicans supported military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, they were content to allow human-rights violations to continue in Sudan, and to work closely with another human-rights violator, China, in diplomacy with North Korea. These were all subtly different situations that needed to be addressed differently, but “the left” used the opportunity to paint Republicans as inconsistent and unprincipled. Rush Limbaugh pointed out on his radio show that Bill Clinton vetoed the partial-birth abortion ban even though most people (even generally pro-choice ones) were for the ban. Also, John Kerry voted against parental consent laws (concerning abortions for minors) even though most people (including generally pro-choice ones) were for parental consent. Limbaugh’s explanations? The “right” represents most people, including the middle, while the “left” is only a radical fringe.

It is my theory that most people are in the middle somewhere and that they do not fall into neat groups at all – and certainly not only two groups (conservative and liberal). Framing the debate this way allows both sides to play us off each other and stay in power while ignoring the real solutions that lie somewhere in between. How someone is classified depends on the questions asked and which side they fall on depends on the frames used.


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Hi, I'm Dan. I like chocolate, hiking, and politics.

    Archives

    November 2019
    April 2019
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    May 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Al Gore
    Anarchy
    Animals
    Ann Coulter
    Anti-Semitism
    Approval Rate
    Barack Obama
    Bias
    Bill Clinton
    Budget Deficit
    Bush Bashing
    Bush-Bashing
    Bush-bashing
    Capitalism
    Center
    Christmas
    Civility
    Code Words
    Coffee Parties
    Collectivism
    Compromise
    Conservative
    Constitution
    Court Rulings
    Culture
    Debate
    Democrats
    Dick Cheney
    Discrimination
    Donald Trump
    Drew Weston
    Economy
    Education
    Environment
    Eric Holder
    Euthanasia
    Experience
    Flag Burning
    France
    George W Bush
    Glenn Beck
    Global Warming
    Health Care
    Hillary Clinton
    Historical Narrative
    Holiday
    Homosexual
    Huffington Post
    Humor
    Hypocrisy
    Immigration
    Independent
    Insult
    Insurance
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jared Loughner
    Jimmy Buffet
    John Kerry
    John Mccain
    Jon Stewart
    Joseph Stark
    Journalism
    Judith Curry
    Julian Assange
    Koran
    Liberal
    Libya
    Marginalization
    Marketing
    Marriage
    Media
    Memes
    Mike Huckabee
    Military
    Mit Romney
    Monopoly
    National Debt
    Occupy Wall Street
    Osama Bin Laden
    Partisanship
    Political Spectrum
    Pragmatism
    Prejudice
    Privacy
    Psychology
    Rachel Maddow
    Racism
    Recession
    Religion
    Republicans
    Rights
    Rush Limbaugh
    Sarah Palin
    Sean Hannity
    Semantics
    Sex
    Sexism
    Socialism
    Sources
    State Rights
    State Secrets
    Stephen Colbert
    Suicide
    Taxes
    Tea Parties
    Term Limits
    Theory
    Tom Tancredo
    Torture
    Unions
    Van Jones
    Wikileaks

    RSS Feed

Please check out my books!

  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books