The Understanding Project
  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books

No We Can't

6/15/2012

 
I recently saw an ad for The Rachel Maddow Show on the back of a magazine. The quote ran something along the lines of: “If your big idea is ‘no we can’t,’ I don’t want you leading the country.” I’m not sure what she’s talking about, but I have some ideas.

At first thought, it would seem that leadership is built around the idea of leading “to something.” A leader must have an idea in mind of something that can be done. “No we can’t” is not an idea; it is the lack of any idea, and therefore not leadership. Put this way, it is impossible to lead on a non-idea, no one will follow, and so Maddow has nothing to worry about. I suspect, however, that “leading the country” is a euphemism for the presidency.

When it comes to the presidency, “no we can’t” isn’t always a bad thing. Sometimes it is mere prudence to declare on minor details that, “we can’t do that; we’ll do it a different way,” while never losing sight of the goal and continuing to press onwards. Sometimes “no we can’t” isn’t meant to be an absolute, but merely means that for many things, the way the government is structured, by the very nature of what it means to be a government, inefficiencies and corruption will set in to such a degree that the private sector will certainly do a better job, and by the government getting involved, resources will be drained that could be better used by the private sector. Historically, this has often been the case. Thus, “no we can’t” might simply be honesty. I believe John Stossel lays out some examples of this in his new book, but I have not read it. Other times, “no we can’t” might simply mean that in the capacity of president, there are some things that go beyond that role, or are perhaps even illegal. Thus, “no we can’t” might sometimes simply be honesty about the law, not a declaration that something can’t be physically done if others go along with it, or if the law is changed. The presidency is not purely a leadership position. It has a very limited role. By being part of the executive branch, it cannot make law or rule on cases, and by being part of the federal government, it cannot step outside the constitution or encroach upon states’ rights. The president is rarely an expert on everything, and being only one man (or woman) he cannot lead in all things simultaneously. “No we can’t” might simply be an admission that there are only so many hours in the day. Seth Godin describes a world where everyone is a leader in his book, Tribes. This is already becoming reality, and so the pressure is being taken off the president.

I don’t know what she meant, and I hate to read too much into it (people do the same thing to me and they are often wrong), but if my hunch is correct, it seems she does not understand why phrases similar to “no we can’t” are often used by politicians. It reminds me of those who claim the GOP is “the party of no.” The desire to do something rather than nothing, even when one doesn’t know what to do, and even when the ideas proposed would clearly make the problem worse, skews the judgment of some people. I’m not talking about a left versus right issue; I’m not a republican and I recognize that republicans sometimes make the same mistakes. I’m not just talking politics; I’m talking about a general principle of life. Sometimes, doing nothing is the best choice. This is prudence and common sense. To insist that our leaders must always have a positive action to propose for every perceived problem, rather than judging each proposal on its merits on a case-by-case basis (including the proposal to do nothing), seems wildly reckless to me. I do hope that this isn’t what these people really believe.


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Hi, I'm Dan. I like chocolate, hiking, and politics.

    Archives

    November 2019
    April 2019
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    May 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Al Gore
    Anarchy
    Animals
    Ann Coulter
    Anti-Semitism
    Approval Rate
    Barack Obama
    Bias
    Bill Clinton
    Budget Deficit
    Bush Bashing
    Bush-Bashing
    Bush-bashing
    Capitalism
    Center
    Christmas
    Civility
    Code Words
    Coffee Parties
    Collectivism
    Compromise
    Conservative
    Constitution
    Court Rulings
    Culture
    Debate
    Democrats
    Dick Cheney
    Discrimination
    Donald Trump
    Drew Weston
    Economy
    Education
    Environment
    Eric Holder
    Euthanasia
    Experience
    Flag Burning
    France
    George W Bush
    Glenn Beck
    Global Warming
    Health Care
    Hillary Clinton
    Historical Narrative
    Holiday
    Homosexual
    Huffington Post
    Humor
    Hypocrisy
    Immigration
    Independent
    Insult
    Insurance
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jared Loughner
    Jimmy Buffet
    John Kerry
    John Mccain
    Jon Stewart
    Joseph Stark
    Journalism
    Judith Curry
    Julian Assange
    Koran
    Liberal
    Libya
    Marginalization
    Marketing
    Marriage
    Media
    Memes
    Mike Huckabee
    Military
    Mit Romney
    Monopoly
    National Debt
    Occupy Wall Street
    Osama Bin Laden
    Partisanship
    Political Spectrum
    Pragmatism
    Prejudice
    Privacy
    Psychology
    Rachel Maddow
    Racism
    Recession
    Religion
    Republicans
    Rights
    Rush Limbaugh
    Sarah Palin
    Sean Hannity
    Semantics
    Sex
    Sexism
    Socialism
    Sources
    State Rights
    State Secrets
    Stephen Colbert
    Suicide
    Taxes
    Tea Parties
    Term Limits
    Theory
    Tom Tancredo
    Torture
    Unions
    Van Jones
    Wikileaks

    RSS Feed

Please check out my books!

  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books