The Understanding Project
  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books

Introduction

5/22/2010

 
            Hi. I am Daniel Noe. I interview people to understand how they think politically, who they consider a reliable source of political information, how they came to deem them reliable, what arguments and counterarguments they have been exposed to, and how their political thought relates to how they think in general. I report what I find in my updates. This site is about understanding people. How do liberals think? How do conservatives think? Do some people think at all? Whether you wish to understand others for the sake of getting along or for the sake of better knowing how to defeat them in the next election, this site is for you. Either way, I will do my best to deliver the truth.
                I have wondered for a long time how it is that some people think differently. Frankly, some people say stupid things. Of course, everybody has their opinions of why. There are those who tell me that those who think differently have deliberately rebelled against reason and have been “given over to a depraved mind” – as the bible says. Seeing as most of these people drive vehicles, hold jobs, and tie their own shoelaces, clearly this is not true. Stupidity in politics does not translate into stupidity in life. Considering that most races come very close to 50%-50% (speaking of the United States), meaning very large numbers of people who think differently, we would be in much worse trouble if this were true.

                I have been told that those who are pro-choice do not understand that fetus is more than just a clump of cells with the potential to be a baby (it is indistinguishable from a baby), and that there are even cases of those who have changed their minds after seeing sonogram images of said fetuses. Is this true? Can the debate over abortion really be solved simply with sonograms? Or is there perhaps a deeper argument in play here?

                Gun-rights sympathizers often repeat the maxim: “guns don’t kill people; people kill people,” to simultaneously explain the arguments that even with guns gone, people who wish to kill will still find ways to do so (using baseball bats or sleeping pills in the coffee), negating any arguments by gun-control sympathizers, and that like any other tool, guns are harmless without a harmful human operator, thus shifting the focus to bad people, rather than innocent gun owners. This usage seems to reveal the worldview that if only people heard and understood this, they would forget about gun control and go after bad people. Is this true? Can the firearms issue really be solved by reaching everyone with this saying? Not really. I learned this when I heard once heard Bill Moyers respond to this saying in a monologue advocating for gun control, “It’s true; people do kill people – with guns.” Clearly, there is more to this debate than lack of knowledge.

                Everybody has heard countless reasons of why people think the way they do, but I wonder how many of these explanations are true. Are all who oppose war wussy pacifist bedwetters? Are all who support war redneck thrillseekers? Do those opposing abortion really believe in the authority of men over women and the authority of the church over the state? Are those that support abortion truly unaware that a fetus has a heartbeat, responds to sounds, and is more than a mere clump of cells? Are those opposing homosexual marriage merely sexually insecure? Are those who drive SUVs truly uncaring about the environment? Are those that deny global warming the same people that deny the holocaust, deny the moon landing, and refuse to accept President Obama’s birth certificate? Are those who believe in global warming the same people that believe in alien abductions, believe in government conspiracies, and see Elvis Priestly at the gas station?

                If you really want to understand the other side, keep reading. If you are content with what you have been told, go back to your talk radio, your newspaper editorials, and your television news.

Comments are closed.

    Author

    Hi, I'm Dan. I like chocolate, hiking, and politics.

    Archives

    November 2019
    April 2019
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    May 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    February 2012
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Abortion
    Al Gore
    Anarchy
    Animals
    Ann Coulter
    Anti-Semitism
    Approval Rate
    Barack Obama
    Bias
    Bill Clinton
    Budget Deficit
    Bush Bashing
    Bush-Bashing
    Bush-bashing
    Capitalism
    Center
    Christmas
    Civility
    Code Words
    Coffee Parties
    Collectivism
    Compromise
    Conservative
    Constitution
    Court Rulings
    Culture
    Debate
    Democrats
    Dick Cheney
    Discrimination
    Donald Trump
    Drew Weston
    Economy
    Education
    Environment
    Eric Holder
    Euthanasia
    Experience
    Flag Burning
    France
    George W Bush
    Glenn Beck
    Global Warming
    Health Care
    Hillary Clinton
    Historical Narrative
    Holiday
    Homosexual
    Huffington Post
    Humor
    Hypocrisy
    Immigration
    Independent
    Insult
    Insurance
    Iraq
    Israel
    Jared Loughner
    Jimmy Buffet
    John Kerry
    John Mccain
    Jon Stewart
    Joseph Stark
    Journalism
    Judith Curry
    Julian Assange
    Koran
    Liberal
    Libya
    Marginalization
    Marketing
    Marriage
    Media
    Memes
    Mike Huckabee
    Military
    Mit Romney
    Monopoly
    National Debt
    Occupy Wall Street
    Osama Bin Laden
    Partisanship
    Political Spectrum
    Pragmatism
    Prejudice
    Privacy
    Psychology
    Rachel Maddow
    Racism
    Recession
    Religion
    Republicans
    Rights
    Rush Limbaugh
    Sarah Palin
    Sean Hannity
    Semantics
    Sex
    Sexism
    Socialism
    Sources
    State Rights
    State Secrets
    Stephen Colbert
    Suicide
    Taxes
    Tea Parties
    Term Limits
    Theory
    Tom Tancredo
    Torture
    Unions
    Van Jones
    Wikileaks

    RSS Feed

Please check out my books!

  • Logic
  • About
  • Author
  • Books